Posts tagged: GMC Safari

How do I disable the air bag?

Question:

I am going to be doing some poking around the colum wires. I am installing an after market remote start. Before I start, how do I disable the drivers air bag on an 94 GMC Safari AWD.

Response:

"1234"  wrote > I am going to be doing some poking around the colum wires. I am > installing an after market remote start. Before I start, > how do I disable the drivers air bag on an 94 GMC Safari AWD.

The air bag connectors are big yellow connectors, the drivers side one will be somewhere at the base/midpoint of the steering column.  You can disconnect the battery, pull the ABS fuse, give it a couple of minutes and then disconnect the yellow connector. Ian

Response:

DEX-COOL, Conventional Green, & G-05… My Experiences

Question:

The coolant never goes thru the transmission. The transmission fluid goes through the lower part of the radiator for some cooling effect. Some cars have a separate tranny fluid radiator for cooling, called atf cooler. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Not really.  The cooling systems are physically no different.  The coolant > goes from the radiator thru the engine, transmission, and heater core and > then back to the radiator.

Response:

>> Just my experience, but ran the original green anti-freeze in our > Dodge 024 for nearly twenty years. >You probably didn’t take any long vacations in that feat of engineering,

several — 2001 Grand Prix GT http://727tj.tripod.com/

Response:

> Yes and no.  Semis do have a long life coolant, but it is only good for > approxiamtely 300,000 miles in which it is time to rebuild the semi

engine. Eh? WTF are you talking about?

Response:

"Buford T. Justice"  wrote > There is no steam in a correctly filled cooling system. > Yes there is.  How does a radiator cap open to let excess coolant into the > overflow tank?  Magic?

No, it’s not magic, but it’s certainly not steam.  It’s simply the fact that the coolant expands as it heats, the rad cap is set to maintain 15 lbs of pressure in the system, once pressure goes past that, the cap unseats itself and allows coolant to flow to the overflow tank.  Pretty simple stuff actually, no steam or magic involved. > Keep the overflow filled to the HOT line on a cool system?  That should tell > the GM engineers are on crack.

Not really, it’s just their way of trying to ensure that the cooling system does not get air into it for a longer period of time.  The air in the system is really only a problem with any of the engines that have a cast iron block, or heads.  I’ve seen very few if any sludging problems with the all aluminum engines.  Also the vehicles that use a radiator cap, and a separate non-pressurized overflow tank seem to be the most susceptible to the sludging problem.  I’ve seen very few problems with the vehicles that have the hard plastic pressurized overflow tank that has the ‘rad’ cap mounted on the overflow tank not the rad. > DEX-COOL is getting a bad rap because GM didn’t do enough real world tests > on it.  The simple truth of the matter is if DEX-COOL is in direct contact > with air in one way or another then you will get mud.  As I said, wait to a > tennager at Jiffy Lube tops off your empty overflow tank with green.  Do you > really thing they will take your radiator cap off to look and see what type > of antifreeze your are running?  How about NO!

Of course, this is really more the fault of stupid customers that take their vehicles to a place like Jiffy Lube.  And the problem is not Dexcool in direct contact with air, it’s a cooling system that is allowed to be run at a low level for an extended period of time with an engine that has at least a cast iron block. > Super Cleaner being ran for 4 – 6 hours ring any bells?  I and many > uninformed people converted to DEX-COOL thinking it would last longer and be > a better choice.  Man were we wrong.

I don’t believe that GM ever recommended changing to Dexcool on older cars. By the way, I’m not a big fan of Dexcool.  I work with vehicles that use it all day and I’ve come to the conclusion that it cannot be relied upon to last as long as GM says it should.  We now advise people to change Dexcool at about the 100K kilometer mark, or every 3 years.  This seems to work well, and cuts down on the incidence of cooling system problems with Dexcool. Ian

Response:

That was a typo.  It happens.  My bad. BTJustice

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What does that have to do with your claim of 300K mile rebuilds?

Response:

> > Eh? WTF are you talking about?

http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=27&article_id=2264… > umber=1 > "No one, it turns out, likes maintenance less than long-haul diesel > truckers. Turcotte told me about Zerex Extended Life. This red juice is > designed to go full-strength into truck radiators. Do nothing for the first > 300,000 miles or three years. Then throw in another whack of inhibitors, a > quart of Zerex Extended Life Extender, and run another 300,000, at which > point the engine is probably scheduled for a full tear-down."

What does that have to do with your claim of 300K mile rebuilds?

Response:

"Phillip Schmid"  wrote > In all fairness to GM, my grampas 97 Silverado (I think that’s at ~125k > miles and he just changed the Dex-Cool) and my uncles 99 Safari have > Dex-Cool and haven’t had a problem. Yet our 99 Blazer had the sludge build > up (which GM paid to fix and convert to green antifreeze) and we had no heat > in the middle of a Wisconsin winter. I can guarantee that the overflow tank > was at the full line every time we checked it (hot line when hot and hot > line when it was cold). That brings up a question though, how can 2 same > engines (the Vortech 4300 in the Safari and Blazer) have 2 very different > results with Dex-Cool ?

I can’t really answer that question to anybody’s satisfaction. I’ve seen all of the above vehicles with sludging problems in our shop, but the Blazer’s are by far the worst.  I’m sure that you kept your coolant level up, but most customers don’t. And often the coolant level in the rad can be low, while the overflow is full.  This is because the rad cap gets so bunged up that it can no longer pull the coolant back into the rad as the coolant cools down. Ian

Response:

Because DEX-COOL sucks and the level was low in your radiator.  If you filled your overflow tank to the hot line when the engine was cold and it was at the same level when the engine was hot then the radiator had to be low.  DEX-COOL doesn’t like playing with air.  How is it running with conventional green? BTJustice

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In all fairness to GM, my grampas 97 Silverado (I think that’s at ~125k > miles and he just changed the Dex-Cool) and my uncles 99 Safari have > Dex-Cool and haven’t had a problem. Yet our 99 Blazer had the sludge build > up (which GM paid to fix and convert to green antifreeze) and we had no heat > in the middle of a Wisconsin winter. I can guarantee that the overflow tank > was at the full line every time we checked it (hot line when hot and hot > line when it was cold). That brings up a question though, how can 2 same > engines (the Vortech 4300 in the Safari and Blazer) have 2 very different > results with Dex-Cool ?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "Buford T. Justice"  wrote > > There is no steam in a correctly filled cooling system. > Yes there is.  How does a radiator cap open to let excess coolant into the > overflow tank?  Magic? > No, it’s not magic, but it’s certainly not steam.  It’s simply the fact that > the coolant expands as it heats, the rad cap is set to maintain 15 lbs > of pressure in the system, once pressure goes past that, the cap > unseats itself and allows coolant to flow to the overflow tank.  Pretty > simple stuff actually, no steam or magic involved. > Keep the overflow filled to the HOT line on a cool system?  That should > tell > the GM engineers are on crack. > Not really, it’s just their way of trying to ensure that the cooling system > does not get air into it for a longer period of time.  The air in the > system is really only a problem with any of the engines that have > a cast iron block, or heads.  I’ve seen very few if any sludging problems > with the all aluminum engines.  Also the vehicles that use a radiator cap, > and a separate non-pressurized overflow tank seem to be the most > susceptible to the sludging problem.  I’ve seen very few problems with > the vehicles that have the hard plastic pressurized overflow tank that > has the ‘rad’ cap mounted on the overflow tank not the rad. > DEX-COOL is getting a bad rap because GM didn’t do enough real world tests > on it.  The simple truth of the matter is if DEX-COOL is in direct contact > with air in one way or another then you will get mud.  As I said, wait to > a > tennager at Jiffy Lube tops off your empty overflow tank with green.  Do > you > really thing they will take your radiator cap off to look and see what > type > of antifreeze your are running?  How about NO! > Of course, this is really more the fault of stupid customers that take > their vehicles to a place like Jiffy Lube.  And the problem is not Dexcool > in direct contact with air, it’s a cooling system that is allowed to be run > at a low level for an extended period of time with an engine that has > at least a cast iron block. > Super Cleaner being ran for 4 – 6 hours ring any bells?  I and many > uninformed people converted to DEX-COOL thinking it would last longer and > be > a better choice.  Man were we wrong. > I don’t believe that GM ever recommended changing to Dexcool on > older cars. > By the way, I’m not a big fan of Dexcool.  I work with vehicles that use > it all day and I’ve come to the conclusion that it cannot be relied upon > to last as long as GM says it should.  We now advise people to change > Dexcool at about the 100K kilometer mark, or every 3 years.  This > seems to work well, and cuts down on the incidence of cooling system > problems with Dexcool. > Ian

In all fairness to GM, my grampas 97 Silverado (I think that’s at ~125k miles and he just changed the Dex-Cool) and my uncles 99 Safari have Dex-Cool and haven’t had a problem. Yet our 99 Blazer had the sludge build up (which GM paid to fix and convert to green antifreeze) and we had no heat in the middle of a Wisconsin winter. I can guarantee that the overflow tank was at the full line every time we checked it (hot line when hot and hot line when it was cold). That brings up a question though, how can 2 same engines (the Vortech 4300 in the Safari and Blazer) have 2 very different results with Dex-Cool ?

Response:

> several

http://727tj.tripod.com/omni.htm Looks like a yard ornament now. BTJustice

Response:

> Eh? WTF are you talking about?

http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=27&article_id=2264… umber=1 "No one, it turns out, likes maintenance less than long-haul diesel truckers. Turcotte told me about Zerex Extended Life. This red juice is designed to go full-strength into truck radiators. Do nothing for the first 300,000 miles or three years. Then throw in another whack of inhibitors, a quart of Zerex Extended Life Extender, and run another 300,000, at which point the engine is probably scheduled for a full tear-down."

Response:

> No, it’s not magic, but it’s certainly not steam.  It’s simply the fact that > the coolant expands as it heats, the rad cap is set to maintain 15 lbs > of pressure in the system, once pressure goes past that, the cap > unseats itself and allows coolant to flow to the overflow tank.  Pretty > simple stuff actually, no steam or magic involved.

Yes and no.  It is not complete steam but the beginning of the steam process that opens the radiator cap which is the cause of the pressure.  If you open your radiator cap with a completely warm engine you will see what I mean when you see the steam and HOT coolant fly out. > Not really, it’s just their way of trying to ensure that the cooling system > does not get air into it for a longer period of time.  The air in the > system is really only a problem with any of the engines that have > a cast iron block, or heads.  I’ve seen very few if any sludging problems > with the all aluminum engines.  Also the vehicles that use a radiator cap, > and a separate non-pressurized overflow tank seem to be the most > susceptible to the sludging problem.  I’ve seen very few problems with > the vehicles that have the hard plastic pressurized overflow tank that > has the ‘rad’ cap mounted on the overflow tank not the rad.

Yes a lot of newer vehicles are losing the radiator cap altogether and simply running it on the overflow tank, but most cars still have a radiator with a radiator cap and an overflow tank that is non-pressurized.  I honestly doubt the metal makes any difference, but I have heard the DEX-COOL does not like lead solder which use to be used for the metal lines going into the radiator. > Of course, this is really more the fault of stupid customers that take > their vehicles to a place like Jiffy Lube.  And the problem is not Dexcool > in direct contact with air, it’s a cooling system that is allowed to be run > at a low level for an extended period of time with an engine that has > at least a cast iron block.

As I said in my original post, my family is a GM family.  However, I don’t think the GM engineers deserve god-like status or anything.  If the coolant is low in your cooling system, the idiot light on the dash should be on to alert the owner of this problem.  I personally do most of the work on my vehicle.  I might go to a Jiffy Lube in the dead of winter, and, when I do, I bring my own oil and filter.  I only make them change the oil and nothing else.  Thousand, and arguably millions, of people don’t have the benefit of knowing how to do light maintenance on their vehicles and trust the places they go to 100% for that maintenance. > I don’t believe that GM ever recommended changing to Dexcool on > older cars.

No, but Texeco, the co-creator of DEX-COOL, does.  Look here… http://www.havoline.com/products/na/antifreeze.html > By the way, I’m not a big fan of Dexcool.  I work with vehicles that use > it all day and I’ve come to the conclusion that it cannot be relied upon > to last as long as GM says it should.  We now advise people to change > Dexcool at about the 100K kilometer mark, or every 3 years.  This > seems to work well, and cuts down on the incidence of cooling system > problems with Dexcool.

Yes I believe changing coolant every 2-3 years is the smart thing to do. However, there really is no hope for DEX-COOL and GM is starting to realize this.  Probably within the next few years, especially after this class action lawsuit over DEX-COOL, GM will either go back to conventional green, go to G-05, or come out with something completely different.  Hope they don’t make blue coolant.  I can see someone pouring that into their washer fluid tank already. According to the Zerex website below, their G-05 meets the current GM specs, but they do not recommend going over to G-05 from DEX-COOL though it is probably safe.  Has anyone reading hits thread gone the G-05 from DEX-COOL? http://www.valvoline.com/pages/products/product_detail.asp?product=10 (CLICK ON PRODUCT SPECS) BTJustice

Response:

>> Dex-cool is a specific style antifreeze > in that the whole entire system has to be designed for it. >Not really.  The cooling systems are physically no different.  The coolant >goes from the radiator thru the engine, transmission, and heater core and >then back to the radiator.

What about the gasket materials, are they the same? > Also, there is > nothing wrong with running a coolant that is long life for a longer period > of time. >Yes there is!  As long as no more water or antifreeze is added to a cooling >system, the freeze point is permanent, but the boilover and and protection >points do change.

Just my experience, but ran the original green anti-freeze in our Dodge 024 for nearly twenty years. > As long as you check the coolant from time to time for > discoloration from contamination and the such, you will be good to go. New > semi’s that have engines worth as much as a new truck use this type of >long > life coolant as well. >Yes and no.  Semis do have a long life coolant, but it is only good for >approxiamtely 300,000 miles in which it is time to rebuild the semi engine. >If hte engine is fine, then they pour in a bottle which extends the life of >the coolant. >BTJustice

— 2001 Grand Prix GT http://727tj.tripod.com/

Response:

> What about the gasket materials, are they the same?

They were until GM had a recall on the 3800s.  Then another recall on the intake manifold gasket bolts.  Crazy stuff. > Just my experience, but ran the original green anti-freeze in our > Dodge 024 for nearly twenty years.

You probably didn’t take any long vacations in that feat of engineering, lol. BTJustice

Response:

> There is a problem with your theory.

It is not a theory.  They are simple "real-world" facts. > Dex-cool is a specific style antifreeze > in that the whole entire system has to be designed for it.

Not really.  The cooling systems are physically no different.  The coolant goes from the radiator thru the engine, transmission, and heater core and then back to the radiator. > It is like trying > to run R134a freon in an R12. Of course you are going to get all kinds of > grief with gaskets and the such. The basic chemical composition of Dex-cool > and a traditional glycol antifreeze are very different.

This is a bad example.  R134A and R12 do require 2 completely different systems to run.  DEX-COOL and conventional green do not require different cooling systems and have the same chemical compostion which is ethylene glycol.  DEX-COOL uses organic inhibitors and conventional green uses inorganic inhibitors. > Also, there is > nothing wrong with running a coolant that is long life for a longer period > of time.

Yes there is!  As long as no more water or antifreeze is added to a cooling system, the freeze point is permanent, but the boilover and and protection points do change. > As long as you check the coolant from time to time for > discoloration from contamination and the such, you will be good to go. New > semi’s that have engines worth as much as a new truck use this type of long > life coolant as well.

Yes and no.  Semis do have a long life coolant, but it is only good for approxiamtely 300,000 miles in which it is time to rebuild the semi engine. If hte engine is fine, then they pour in a bottle which extends the life of the coolant. BTJustice

Response:

> 98 bonneville 75k miles (5 year old coolant until just recently), Clean as > hell coolant and overflow bottle. I pulled both my upper and lower intakes > to repair a leak caused by the egr pipe and the cooling passages had NO > oxidation, coatings, or sludge what so ever. The metal was as bright and > shiny as the day it was assembled.

Glad to hear DEX-COOL is working fine for you.  Others are not so lucky. > If its a silica based coolant it will eat up the aluminum components. Also > the temp sensor is balanced to read a dexcool system. It may not have the > resistance to the coating that green coolant leaves on everything. Though > they make mistakes in designs now and then do you really know more about > the cooling system than the GM engineers that designed it?

I have yet to see a green coolant sold at any major auto supply store that does not protect aluminum.  The temp sensor doesn;t care what is in the cooling system.  It simply monitors the temp of what is in the cooling system.  Try running just straight water and you will see the temp is the same, but he water will start rusting your aluminum components.  Texeco was the primary engineer of DEX-COOL. > There is no steam in a correctly filled cooling system.

Yes there is.  How does a radiator cap open to let excess coolant into the overflow tank?  Magic? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> You dont understand what I’m saying, I’ll try my best to explain > everything I have experienced and read about. Air in the overflow bottle > wont muddy it. Its intense heat and low coolant levels that cause the > coolant to crystalize. Basically when theres air in the system its cooking > the coolant. Put salt water in a saucer and let it evaporate and you’re > left with salt crystals coating the saucer. Basically the same thing > happens to dexcool and thats why it looks muddy because of air in the > system and "intense heat". When you put non distilled water or another > substance in the coolant it causes the chemicals that make up dexcool, to > the best i can tell, fall out of suspension or to latch onto the > contaminates or the sludge is the contaminate. >  If you’re overflow bottle is muddy it was contaminated or your cooling > system is low. When its low air is in the system and steam now builds up > and pushes the coolant into the overflow bottle. Then all that crystalized > coolant clogs up your radiator cap and what went into the overflow bottle > doesnt make it back in so it tricks you into thinking your system is full. > Thats why you need to uncap it now and then just to make sure its really > full.

Now that is good advise.  It is important ot remove the radiaotr cap from time ot time to be sure the radiator is actually full. > I do my own maintenance so its not impossible for me. Do what I do, keep > it filled to the hot line when the engine is cool. GM is actually > recommending that in their service bulletins. If some shop contaminates > your cooling system pursue them in court if thats what it takes to correct > that problem.

Keep the overflow filled to the HOT line on a cool system?  That should tell the GM engineers are on crack. > I got a website marked somewhere that covers dexcool and other coolants > pretty well. If I come accross it in the next few days I’ll post it. > Dexcool is getting a bad wrap by people who dont try to fully understand > it or dont maintain there systems correctly. If you never EVER contaminate > an "original" dexcool system it wont get muddy. If you dont ever ever let > air into the "COOLING SYSTEM" (not the overflow bottle) it wont get muddy.

DEX-COOL is getting a bad rap because GM didn’t do enough real world tests on it.  The simple truth of the matter is if DEX-COOL is in direct contact with air in one way or another then you will get mud.  As I said, wait to a tennager at Jiffy Lube tops off your empty overflow tank with green.  Do you really thing they will take your radiator cap off to look and see what type of antifreeze your are running?  How about NO! > You mentioned you tried to upgrade cooling systems that never originally > had dexcool. The only possible chance that could have maybe worked is if > the system was acid flushed repeatedly. Even then it would still be iffy.

Super Cleaner being ran for 4 – 6 hours ring any bells?  I and many uninformed people converted to DEX-COOL thinking it would last longer and be a better choice.  Man were we wrong. BTJustice

Response:

I have read about this sometime ago and here is information that may be beneficial to everyone. I guess there is pro’s and con’s for everything.  So the pro’s is DEX-COOL offer excellent heat transfer capability thus if it is done properly. Check out this reference article http://www.theherd.com/articles/dex_cool.html The con’s perhaps it is does not last as long as expected.  Also,  there is a big class action pending with GM right now about this …. Here is the links for your reference. http://www.bigclassaction.com/class_action/dexcool.html   and this one . http://www.geocities.com/b_gillie/dexcool_problems.html Myself I would probably not convert back but replace the DEX-COOL  regularly (may be every 3 years or less under extreme climate) MN – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> My family is a GM family.  There have been a few  exceptions to this.  My > Grandma’s parents owned a Ford Model T, found out it was a piece of junk, > and traded it for a Chevrolet.  I owned a 1995 Ford Mustang GT for a few > months back in 1997 (great car).  And my brother currently owns a Mitsubishi > Eclipse. > I am the one that usually changes the coolant in my family’s vehicles.  I > remember back around 1996 or so, I was driving a 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo > and decided to convert it to the new red DEX-COOL coolant that had just came > out.  When I say "convert" I mean doing my 22 steps below as to obtain a 60% > antifreeze to 40% water mixture.  I later bought a 1991 Chevrolet Lumina and > then a 1992 Chevrolet S-10 after owning several other cars between those and > the 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.  I converted the Lumina to DEX-COOL.  It > ruined a gasket that had to be replaced.  The S-10 was even worse.  After > converting it, it would blow smoke out of the tailpipe every time it was > started due to coolant leaking into one of the cylinders. > I decided to get rid of the S-10 earlier this month and bought a 1995 > Pontiac Grand Prix GTP with every option imaginable.  After a few days of > owning it, I checked the coolant to find that it was BROWN!  That means it > hadn’t been serviced for quite some time.  I figured it was DEX-COOL so I > flushed the cooling system and poured in some fresh DEX-COOL.  After doing > that, I found out it had conventional green instead so, after about 3 days > of DEX-COOL, I converted my car back over to green using Zerex 5/100 > Coolant.  I think I got the DEX-COOL out in time before it could start > eating away at gaskets and seals and start spawning that reddish brown mud > in my cooling system. > Now around 2000, I converted my Mom’s 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo from green > to DEX-COOL.  After finding out about my Pontiac originally having green, I > decided to convert her car back to green.  I was SHOCKED to find that the > DEX-COOL had turned into that damned reddish brown mud.  The throat of her > radiator and the radiator cap were almost ruined.  It took me an good hour > of scrubbing the radiator cap with a tooth brush to get it clean. > I did the exact same thing to her car that I had done to mine.  I used the > back flush tee I had installed in 2000, back flushed her car with the engine > running with the heater on high for 30 minutes, poured in a bottle of Zerex > Super Cleaner, had her drive the car on and off for about 6 hours, drained > the radiator, back flushed again with the engine on and the heater on high > for 15 minutes (I was happy to see the mud coming out knowing the Zerex > Super Cleaner had done its job), poured in a bottle of Zerex Super Flush and > ran the engine for 15 minutes with the heater on high to be sure all the mud > was gone, drained the radiator, hooked the hose back up to the back flushing > tee, and back flushed again for 30 minutes.  I drained the radiator, took > out the overflow tank and cleaned it out with hot water, Dawn dish soap, and > a bottle brush.  I hooked the overflow tank back up, closed the radiator > drain plug, put the cap back on the back flushing tee, and poured in Zerex > 5/100 Coolant. > That was about a 3 weeks ago.  After checking the overflow tank, radiator, > and radiator cap, I am happy to report that there is no mud and the car runs > great. > All the above is my story with my experiences with DEX-COOL and conventional > green coolant / antifreeze.  I will now explain what I think of conventional > green, DEX-COOL, and G-05. > DEX-COOL > I think this was a bad idea from the start.  You would have to be a complete > moron to run any coolant / antifreeze for 5 years.  A lot of people also > have the misunderstanding that they are not to touch it for 5 years.  This > is just stupidity created by GM. > I think the 2 biggest flaws to DEX-COOL are that if it gets into contact > with conventional green directly or through the deposits left by > conventional green, it will form that reddish brown mud.  If DEX-COOL comes > into contact with air either inside the cooling system or outside, it will > form either the reddish brown mud or the red "cement".  This has been proven > by both owners of some 1996 – Present S-10s and owners of other GM vehicles. > I would probably recommend most folks stick with DEX-COOL if that is what > their vehicle came with, but a lot of brave people have converted back to > conventional green without any problems. > Conventional Green > I think it is the best especially for GM vehicles.  If you do an extremely > thorough back flush (the 22 steps listed below) you will get all the > DEX-COOL out.  I would HIGHLY recommend using Zerex 5/100 Coolant which most > AutoZone stores carry. > G-05 > I have not used this coolant yet, but keep hearing good things about it. It > is designed to work in new Fords and Chryslers and has been used for many > years by Mercedes and John Deere.  I think GM will eventually switch to it. > Now if you would like to back flush the DEX-COOL or any other coolant out of > your vehicle, do it this way (you are responsible for what you do to the > vehicle you are working on). > 1)      Buy a few jugs of Zerex 5/100, either a Prestone or Zerex back > flushing tee, a bottle of Zerex Super Cleaner, and a bottle of Zerex Super > Flush.  You might optionally want to go ahead and replace your thermostat. > 2)      After driving the car for 30 minutes or longer, open the radiator > drain cock, and let the radiator completely drain out.  While you are > waiting, find the heater core hose that runs into the engine (not the one > going to the water pump) and cut it.  Install your back flushing tee. Also > disconnect your overflow tank hose. > 3)      After the radiator is drained, take off the radiator cap. > 4)      Get your garden hose and screw it onto your back flushing tee > connector then put the connector to the back flushing tee you installed.. > 5)      Turn on the water and wait for water to start coming out of both the > radiator drain and top radiator opening. > 6)      Turn on your engine with your heater running on high and let the car > back flush for 30 minutes. > 7)      Turn off the engine and disconnect your garden hose. > 8)      Wait for the water to drain completely from the radiator. > 9)      Close the radiator drain cock. > 10)  Pour in your bottle of Zerex Super Cleaner into the radiator. > 11)  Connect the overflow tank hose and top off radiator with water. > 12)  If you have bleeder valves for air, turn the engine on with the valves > open and wait for water to come out of them in a constant stream then close > the valves. > 13)  Drive your vehicle for 4 – 6 hours which can be on and off and over a > few days.  Be careful the outside temperature is not 32

94 GMC Safari AWD

Question:

I am still getting poor mileage 400km per 80 liter tank. I have the v6 vortec with the w engine. The truck runs perfect but sure sucks the gas. It Starts hot and cold with the flick of the wrist. It has a perfect smooth idle lots of power. When cruising down the hiway I am barely on the pedal. It was worse before I did some repairs now I am stumped. The idle exhaust smells strong not like unburnt gas but like an old sixties v8. Here is what I have done: Checked for codes none found. New air filter, cap, rotor, plugs, wires. Fixed leaky vacuum lines. set timing. Replaced the o rings and CPI unit inside of intake. (ouch $708.00 dollars CDN) I removed the electronic EGR valve it seems ok it moves free and no clogging. I found the fuel tuning valve stuck and fixed it. I would like to know how do I test the o2 sensor and egr etc. with a VOM? Is there an Eprom that might help me also?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am still getting poor mileage 400km per 80 liter tank. > I have the v6 vortec with the w engine. > The truck runs perfect but sure sucks the gas. It Starts hot and cold > with the flick of the wrist. It has a perfect smooth idle lots of power. > When cruising down the hiway I am barely on the pedal. > It was worse before I did some repairs now I am stumped. The idle > exhaust smells strong not like unburnt gas but like an old sixties v8. > Here is what I have done: > Checked for codes none found. > New air filter, cap, rotor, plugs, wires. > Fixed leaky vacuum lines. > set timing. > Replaced the o rings and CPI unit inside of intake. (ouch $708.00 > dollars CDN) > I removed the electronic EGR valve it seems ok it moves free and no > clogging. > I found the fuel tuning valve stuck and fixed it. > I would like to know how do I test the o2 sensor and egr etc. with a > VOM? > Is there an Eprom that might help me also?

My uncle has a 1999 Safari AWD and his mileage is the same. There may be nothing you can really do about it. (248.56000 miles for 21.13383 gallons)

Response:

I ran across this tid-bit of info: SENSOR MALFUNCTION Measure air temperature in the intake manifold and signal computer to adjust air/fuel mixture. FAILURE SYMPTOMS light is on continuously, poor mileage or rich exhaust odor, poor performance and economy. MAINTENANCE/SERVICE Inspect for damage or corrosion on terminals when trouble codes indicate problem in this circuit.  Check sensor for carbon accumulation or contaminants which can cause false readings. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I am still getting poor mileage 400km per 80 liter tank. > I have the v6 vortec with the w engine. > The truck runs perfect but sure sucks the gas. It Starts hot and cold > with the flick of the wrist. It has a perfect smooth idle lots of power. > When cruising down the hiway I am barely on the pedal. > It was worse before I did some repairs now I am stumped. The idle > exhaust smells strong not like unburnt gas but like an old sixties v8. > Here is what I have done: > Checked for codes none found. > New air filter, cap, rotor, plugs, wires. > Fixed leaky vacuum lines. > set timing. > Replaced the o rings and CPI unit inside of intake. (ouch $708.00 > dollars CDN) > I removed the electronic EGR valve it seems ok it moves free and no > clogging. > I found the fuel tuning valve stuck and fixed it. > I would like to know how do I test the o2 sensor and egr etc. with a > VOM? > Is there an Eprom that might help me also?

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I am still getting poor mileage 400km per 80 liter tank. > I have the v6 vortec with the w engine. > The truck runs perfect but sure sucks the gas. It Starts hot and cold > with the flick of the wrist. It has a perfect smooth idle lots of power. > When cruising down the hiway I am barely on the pedal. > It was worse before I did some repairs now I am stumped. The idle > exhaust smells strong not like unburnt gas but like an old sixties v8. > Here is what I have done: > Checked for codes none found. > New air filter, cap, rotor, plugs, wires. > Fixed leaky vacuum lines. > set timing. > Replaced the o rings and CPI unit inside of intake. (ouch $708.00 > dollars CDN) > I removed the electronic EGR valve it seems ok it moves free and no > clogging. > I found the fuel tuning valve stuck and fixed it. > I would like to know how do I test the o2 sensor and egr etc. with a > VOM? > Is there an Eprom that might help me also?

I did it! I am now getting 700 kms per tank. After doing everything above I finally took the o2 sensor out. Removel was easy with a six inch cresent. What I found was the little probe about the size of the end of a baby finger. It had about ten little slits in it and 3 of them were plugged with carbon. I crudely scraped them out with a box cutter knife shot it with wd40 and put the sensor back in. I filled the tank and hit the hiway doing about 115 kms per hour most of the way in the crows nest pass (hilly mountains). We were house hunting and stopped in every town on the way. It was a 600 km round trip and I still got a 1/4 tank left. Mind you the bottom quarter is smaller than the top but the milage is VERY GOOD now! A new o2 sensor is on the way just in case. Not bad for an AWD I would say ( .)(. )

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I did it! > I am now getting 700 kms per tank. > After doing everything above I finally took the o2 sensor out. > Removel was easy with a six inch cresent. > What I found was the little probe about the size of the end of a baby > finger. > It had about ten little slits in it and 3 of them were plugged with > carbon. > I crudely scraped them out with a box cutter knife shot it with wd40 and > put the sensor back in. > I filled the tank and hit the hiway doing about 115 kms per hour most of > the way in the crows nest pass (hilly mountains). We were house hunting > and stopped in every town on the way. It was a 600 km round trip and I > still got a 1/4 tank left. > Mind you the bottom quarter is smaller than the top but the milage is > VERY GOOD now! > A new o2 sensor is on the way just in case. Not bad for an AWD I would > say ( .)(. )

Wow, thats a big improvement. Congrats on finding the problem and fixing it. If only it was that easy to get better economy on our Blazer :(

Response:

Yes a big improvement indeed. Works out to about 22 miles per gallon. My first tank 3 months ago was about 8 or ten miles per gallon. I think spec is 18 on the hiway for these rigs or does anyone know what dealer specs are. I cant wait four our first 40 below to see if it starts. I hate plugging in.   – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I did it! > I am now getting 700 kms per tank. > After doing everything above I finally took the o2 sensor out. > Removel was easy with a six inch cresent. > What I found was the little probe about the size of the end of a baby > finger. > It had about ten little slits in it and 3 of them were plugged with > carbon. > I crudely scraped them out with a box cutter knife shot it with wd40 and > put the sensor back in. > I filled the tank and hit the hiway doing about 115 kms per hour most of > the way in the crows nest pass (hilly mountains). We were house hunting > and stopped in every town on the way. It was a 600 km round trip and I > still got a 1/4 tank left. > Mind you the bottom quarter is smaller than the top but the milage is > VERY GOOD now! > A new o2 sensor is on the way just in case. Not bad for an AWD I would > say ( .)(. ) > Wow, thats a big improvement. Congrats on finding the problem and fixing it. > If only it was that easy to get better economy on our Blazer :(

Response:

> Yes a big improvement indeed. > Works out to about 22 miles per gallon. > My first tank 3 months ago was about 8 or ten miles per gallon. > I think spec is 18 on the hiway for these rigs or does anyone know what > dealer specs are. > I cant wait four our first 40 below to see if it starts. I hate plugging > in.

16 MPG City/21 MPG Highway for the cargo ones and 15 MPG City/19 MPG Highway for the passenger vans.

Response:

> > Yes a big improvement indeed. > Works out to about 22 miles per gallon. > My first tank 3 months ago was about 8 or ten miles per gallon. > I think spec is 18 on the hiway for these rigs or does anyone know what > dealer specs are. > I cant wait four our first 40 below to see if it starts. I hate plugging > in. > 16 MPG City/21 MPG Highway for the cargo ones and 15 MPG City/19 MPG Highway > for the passenger vans.

Thanks. Mine is the eight passenger AWD so I guess I am doing allright then. I filled up today and did the exact calculations and got a number of 20 mpg CDN gallon. I took the rear seats out to make room for a very big dog that reduced the weght some what. I did have the dog and the wife with me and I was driving hard so all in all I gues I am done fixing.

Response:

Help GMC AWD Safari dome light/mileage problem

Question:

I just bought a used 94 Safari van. The problem I am having is with the dome light. The lights will not turn on with both of the front doors. The rear and side doors turn the light on with no problem. The switch on the dash also turns them on. The slider switch on the top center dash also works fine when in the off position the lights do not come on with the rear doors. When I leave the key in the ignition the key buzzer works telling me that the door switches are fine. I suspect that the front doors used to activate a interior light timer ( don’t know because I bought it used) Does anyone know where the timer is and what it looks like. Also I can only get about ten miles to the gallon in the city and fifteen on the hiway. The exhaust smells like an old sixties car. (very strong no pollutin control) I have changed spark plugs, dist cap, rotor, air filter, advanced timing 2 degrees, repaired leaking vacuum hoses etc. There are no stored codes. I removed the six wire EGR and it seems fine moves free and not clogged. I can hear it click open and close when I play with the throttle with the engine cover off. It has very good starting a smooth idle and lots of power. Before doing all the above repairs the mileage was about 30 percent worse. With no code what would be a good guess of parts to replace to get it to smell less rich. There is no rotten egg smell and good power so I don’t suspect the catalytic converter as I was told. Could the o2 or other sensor’s be out of range just enough to give no code but make it burn ritch? It has 205 km on it. I doubt that any sensors have ever been replaced based on the paper work from the previous owner. Would the o2 sensor at $100.00 be a good guess? The EGR control valve is $450.00 so I would block it before I guesed on that part. Where can I find info to check these sensors with a VOM. Ok to email direct thanks in advance.

Response:

> I just bought a used 94 Safari van. > The problem I am having is with the dome light. The lights will not turn > on with both of the front doors. The rear and side doors turn the light > on with no problem. The switch on the dash also turns them on. The > slider switch on the top center dash also works fine when in the off > position the lights do not come on with the rear doors. > When I leave the key in the ignition the key buzzer works telling me > that the door switches are fine.

The door jamb switches contain multiple contacts for the dome light/key buzzer.  The key buzzer contacts can be working fine while the dome light contacts are not. Bad assumption. {snip} > Also I can only get about ten miles to the gallon in the city and > fifteen on the hiway. > The exhaust smells like an old sixties car. (very strong no pollutin > control) > I have changed spark plugs, dist cap, rotor, air filter, advanced timing > 2 degrees, repaired leaking vacuum hoses etc. There are no stored codes.

If yours is a Vortec engine, the first thing to suspect is a faulty CPI unit, including a failed fuel pressure regulator and/or the plastic fuel lines that are internal to the manifold. Checking the fuel trim numbers on a scan tool is a very effective method for determining whether there is a problem with the CPI.  You can remove the tuning valve from the top of the upper plenum and take a look at the inside of the manifold, anything looking like it’s been washed clean is sufficient proof that there is an internal fuel leak in the manifold. Just did a CPI and nut kit on a 92 S-10 Blazer this morning, there was a puddle of gasoline about 3 inches deep in the bottom of the intake manifold…

Response:

Update :I took off the kik panels today. On the drivers side the light wire was broken off easy fix. On the passenger side the wire was melted easy fix. The lights are now working. Yes I have the Vortec W in serial # but what does CPI stand for? Is it the round black thing in the middle of the intake? What does it invole to fix this fuel leak? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I just bought a used 94 Safari van. > The problem I am having is with the dome light. The lights will not turn > on with both of the front doors. The rear and side doors turn the light > on with no problem. The switch on the dash also turns them on. The > slider switch on the top center dash also works fine when in the off > position the lights do not come on with the rear doors. > When I leave the key in the ignition the key buzzer works telling me > that the door switches are fine. > The door jamb switches contain multiple contacts for the > dome light/key buzzer.  The key buzzer contacts can be > working fine while the dome light contacts are not. > Bad assumption. > {snip} > Also I can only get about ten miles to the gallon in the city and > fifteen on the hiway. > The exhaust smells like an old sixties car. (very strong no pollutin > control) > I have changed spark plugs, dist cap, rotor, air filter, advanced timing > 2 degrees, repaired leaking vacuum hoses etc. There are no stored codes. > If yours is a Vortec engine, the first thing to suspect is a > faulty CPI unit, including a failed fuel pressure regulator > and/or the plastic fuel lines that are internal to the > manifold. > Checking the fuel trim numbers on a scan tool is a very > effective method for determining whether there is a problem > with the CPI.  You can remove the tuning valve from the top > of the upper plenum and take a look at the inside of the > manifold, anything looking like it’s been washed clean is > sufficient proof that there is an internal fuel leak in the > manifold. > Just did a CPI and nut kit on a 92 S-10 Blazer this morning, > there was a puddle of gasoline about 3 inches deep in the > bottom of the intake manifold…

Response:

I tryed to remove the tuning valve to take a look but it wont come out. Is the tuning valve that black plastic round thing with wires in the top rear of the intake? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I just bought a used 94 Safari van. > The problem I am having is with the dome light. The lights will not turn > on with both of the front doors. The rear and side doors turn the light > on with no problem. The switch on the dash also turns them on. The > slider switch on the top center dash also works fine when in the off > position the lights do not come on with the rear doors. > When I leave the key in the ignition the key buzzer works telling me > that the door switches are fine. > The door jamb switches contain multiple contacts for the > dome light/key buzzer.  The key buzzer contacts can be > working fine while the dome light contacts are not. > Bad assumption. > {snip} > Also I can only get about ten miles to the gallon in the city and > fifteen on the hiway. > The exhaust smells like an old sixties car. (very strong no pollutin > control) > I have changed spark plugs, dist cap, rotor, air filter, advanced timing > 2 degrees, repaired leaking vacuum hoses etc. There are no stored codes. > If yours is a Vortec engine, the first thing to suspect is a > faulty CPI unit, including a failed fuel pressure regulator > and/or the plastic fuel lines that are internal to the > manifold. > Checking the fuel trim numbers on a scan tool is a very > effective method for determining whether there is a problem > with the CPI.  You can remove the tuning valve from the top > of the upper plenum and take a look at the inside of the > manifold, anything looking like it’s been washed clean is > sufficient proof that there is an internal fuel leak in the > manifold. > Just did a CPI and nut kit on a 92 S-10 Blazer this morning, > there was a puddle of gasoline about 3 inches deep in the > bottom of the intake manifold…

Response:

> I tryed to remove the tuning valve to take a look but it wont come out. > Is the tuning valve that black plastic round thing with wires in the top > rear of the intake?

Yup, that’s it. Remove the two Torx head screws and give it a gentle twist, back and forth.  It’s just a gooed up O-ring holding it back.

Response:

Hey thanks for your help I got the tuning valve out. I then discovered that it was seized. You can tell that it has not moved in years by the marks on the flapper. I was able to free it up with wd40 and few got smack with a wrench while holding the flapper. I put it back in and took a test drive. I can tell that it flips over under hard execration. How mush difference would this have on my mileage if any? I don’t expect much difference it seems to be needed only when I am flooring it. I cant see an obvious fuel leaks inside because of it being a van. From what I can see there are a few slight clean spots so if there are any leaks they are minor. I got a quote today for a new CPI assembly for $517 CDN. plus gst. I sure hopes this helps the mileage and the smelly exhaust. How many kms can one expect from these vans on average any ways? I get about 400 kms per tank and about 300 kms when towing 2000 lbs of trailer. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I tryed to remove the tuning valve to take a look but it wont come out. > Is the tuning valve that black plastic round thing with wires in the top > rear of the intake? > Yup, that’s it. > Remove the two Torx head screws and give it a gentle twist, > back and forth.  It’s just a gooed up O-ring holding it back.

Response:

How many kms can one expect from these vans on average any > ways? I get about 400 kms per tank and about 300 kms when towing 2000 > lbs of trailer.

Hey guys I gotta comment on this one . I’m a previous and present chevy astro owner/ safari is the same Van . My older 1992 astro with 379,000 Km’s still running strong still get 750 km per tank/ summer/ plus or minus 100km winter driving . No load or trailer with a 102 litre fuel tank. Here’s the real kicker that has got me into a battle with GM. My 2003 astro with 35,000kms. gets 535km average per (same size) fuel tank no load or trailer. Where did 215 km of fuel go to!! I’d appreciate hearing from other safari/astro owners as to their gas milage. My mechanic laughs as says its because its not loose yet??!! Ok but do I have to wait that long ???

Response:

unit that came with two O rings for the fuel lines ( orig AC Delco). When I first fired it up it still smelled very rich untill I took it for a 20 minute blast. I can now stand beside the exhaust pipe without chocking. I still think it could be better though. I will just have to burn  a tank or two to see what the killomage is and I will let you all know. Darn thing is sure running sweet not a ripple at idle and much smother at lite exceleration and no differant when I am flooring it ( allways was good when I floored it). Just one big question what does the fuel tuning valve do to fuel/performance. I am asking because that was siezed for some time. Now how will I never know what made the most improvement?     – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hey thanks for your help I got the tuning valve out. > I then discovered that it was seized. You can tell that it has not moved > in years by the marks on the flapper. I was able to free it up with wd40 > and few got smack with a wrench while holding the flapper. I put it back > in and took a test drive. I can tell that it flips over under hard > execration. How mush difference would this have on my mileage if any? > I don’t expect much difference it seems to be needed only when I am > flooring it. > I cant see an obvious fuel leaks inside because of it being a van. From > what I can see there are a few slight clean spots so if there are any > leaks they are minor. I got a quote today for a new CPI assembly for > $517 CDN. plus gst. I sure hopes this helps the mileage and the smelly > exhaust. How many kms can one expect from these vans on average any > ways? I get about 400 kms per tank and about 300 kms when towing 2000 > lbs of trailer. > > I tryed to remove the tuning valve to take a look but it wont come out. > > Is the tuning valve that black plastic round thing with wires in the top > > rear of the intake? > Yup, that’s it. > Remove the two Torx head screws and give it a gentle twist, > back and forth.  It’s just a gooed up O-ring holding it back.

Response:

> unit that came with two O rings for the fuel lines ( orig AC Delco). > When I first fired it up it still smelled very rich untill I took it for > a 20 minute blast. I can now stand beside the exhaust pipe without > chocking. I still think it could be better though. I will just have to > burn  a tank or two to see what the killomage is and I will let you all > know. Darn thing is sure running sweet not a ripple at idle and much > smother at lite exceleration and no differant when I am flooring it ( > allways was good when I floored it). Just one big question what does the > fuel tuning valve do to fuel/performance. I am asking because that was > siezed for some time. Now how will I never know what made the most > improvement?    

Damn, I wish I’d have seen your post from Monday -before- you spent money on parts, I could have steered you to a company that sells completely remanufactured CPI units for way less than you paid, assuming you could afford to wait for it to be shipped. The stuck tuning valve shouldn’t/wouldn’t cause a problem with fuel mileage, it’s there to change the ram length of the intake manifold, so it’s only effects are in the amount of torque the engine is able to produce under various load conditions. Believe me, the improvements came from the new CPI, they’re -that- trouble prone.

Response:

Thanks any way on the offer for rebuilt parts. I did a little research and because of the labor involved I choose OEM. I did find a jobber that was selling a new one for three hundred less but I still choose OEM. I just got back from a 200km towing trip. just by looking at the gauge it looked like I got very good mileage on the way there but terrible on the way back. But still better than before. I am still not happy with the smell of the tail pipe it is better but still a little strong. What bugs me is that I might as well go with a full sized truck with a V8. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> unit that came with two O rings for the fuel lines ( orig AC Delco). > When I first fired it up it still smelled very rich untill I took it for > a 20 minute blast. I can now stand beside the exhaust pipe without > chocking. I still think it could be better though. I will just have to > burn  a tank or two to see what the killomage is and I will let you all > know. Darn thing is sure running sweet not a ripple at idle and much > smother at lite exceleration and no differant when I am flooring it ( > allways was good when I floored it). Just one big question what does the > fuel tuning valve do to fuel/performance. I am asking because that was > siezed for some time. Now how will I never know what made the most > improvement? > Damn, I wish I’d have seen your post from Monday -before- > you spent money on parts, I could have steered you to a > company that sells completely remanufactured CPI units for > way less than you paid, assuming you could afford to wait > for it to be shipped. > The stuck tuning valve shouldn’t/wouldn’t cause a problem > with fuel mileage, it’s there to change the ram length of > the intake manifold, so it’s only effects are in the amount > of torque the engine is able to produce under various load > conditions. > Believe me, the improvements came from the new CPI, they’re > -that- trouble prone.

Response:

98 GMC Safari

Question:

Hi, The check engine light on my GMC Safari has come on solid and is not going off, even after running the recommended fuel injector cleaner. It has been suggested to me that I replace the spark plugs, spark plug wires and cap and rotor. I didn’t think that cap rotor were still being used. I tried looking, but for the life of me I could not even locate where any of these things are? Could somebody point me in the right direction? Thanks. — Kevin Johnson

Response:

Hi Kevin  I have a 1997 Safari I have been getting a check engine light allot. I find out that it is a loose gas cap. As far as the spark plugs go they are suppose to be good for 160,000km. To get to them you can jack your van up and take the front tire off and lift the rubber flap to get at them. The cap and wires is a different story. You have to remove the glove box and then the dog house under the dash. There are 2 torx screws under the caps on either side of the console and 2 bolts under the flap of carpet at the bottom. Then if you look up under the big hump you will see 2 large bolts. Back them out and the hole hump comes free. That is where you will find the back of your engine. I hope this helps. Peter

Response:

The check engine light could be just about anything, going and replacing stuff to try to turn it off is just shooting in the dark. You need to get the codes read out with a scan tool.. — Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > The check engine light on my GMC Safari has come on solid and is not going > off, even after running the recommended fuel injector cleaner. It has been > suggested to me that I replace the spark plugs, spark plug wires and cap and > rotor. I didn’t think that cap rotor were still being used. I tried looking, > but for the life of me I could not even locate where any of these things > are? Could somebody point me in the right direction? Thanks. > — > Kevin Johnson

Response:

Thank you very much. I found a broken vacuum hose but for the life of me cannot find where it broke from. An assembly comes out from the dash area and has three vacuum hoses on it. One of the hoses has a plastic right angle attachment on it. This is the one that broke. — Kevin Johnson – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Look for a small vacuum hose disconnected possibly from the reservoir > tank. > My friend’s Safari is having a/c problems. She said that when she turns > the > air on the vents next to the steering wheel and the top vents on the > passenger side don’t blow any air, but that the vents under the dash on > both > sides are still blowing air just fine. Also, the rear air is still > working > ok. My thought was a blown fuse. Does anyone else have any suggestions if > this proves to be incorrect? Thanks for any advice. > — > Kevin Johnson > —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– > http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

Response:

Look for a small vacuum hose disconnected possibly from the reservoir tank.

> My friend’s Safari is having a/c problems. She said that when she turns the > air on the vents next to the steering wheel and the top vents on the > passenger side don’t blow any air, but that the vents under the dash on both > sides are still blowing air just fine. Also, the rear air is still working > ok. My thought was a blown fuse. Does anyone else have any suggestions if > this proves to be incorrect? Thanks for any advice. > — > Kevin Johnson

—–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

Response:

My friend’s Safari is having a/c problems. She said that when she turns the air on the vents next to the steering wheel and the top vents on the passenger side don’t blow any air, but that the vents under the dash on both sides are still blowing air just fine. Also, the rear air is still working ok. My thought was a blown fuse. Does anyone else have any suggestions if this proves to be incorrect? Thanks for any advice. — Kevin Johnson

Response:

Help me please someone, GMC AWD Noise

Question:

Hello to all, I have a 96 GMC safari V6, AT, AWD. The front differential drive shaft (from transfer case) was removed a few months ago because it was bad,(vibrating at high speeds) and consequently, it drove fine in 2wd at the time. Now, above 35 MPH it starts a steady hum in the front end. The pitch increases with speed and it seems to level out at cruising speed on the highway. I have pulled the front diff in an effort to find the problem. Luckily, I must say that the diff it was real easy to pull. It seemed that the backlash on one side was a bit excessive -( I don’t know the Specs) and it seems on one side the gears may be rough like they are catching a bit on the edge of teeth. Will this be hard to rebuild? I have never rebuilt a diff or AT before; gearboxes/engines/diesels yes. Based on description would diff be at fault?? CV’s and bearings seem okay, no play at all. So now I need info and advice, I can’t ID the differential, no tag and the stamped numbers don’t match anything. Any help appreciated. Thanks, tink

Response:

"Tink"  wrote > I have pulled the front diff in an effort to find the problem. Luckily, I > must say that the diff it was real easy to pull. > It seemed that the backlash on one side was a bit excessive -( I don’t know > the Specs) and it seems on one side the gears may be rough like they are > catching a bit on the edge of teeth. > Will this be hard to rebuild? I have never rebuilt a diff or AT before; > gearboxes/engines/diesels yes. > Based on description would diff be at fault?? CV’s and bearings seem okay,

That’s impossible to tell.  I wouldn’t be pulling a front diff out at work without putting it up on a hoist and running the vehicle while listening to the front diff.  Oh right…you don’t have the front driveshaft installed. If you are lucky enough to actually find the problem you are looking for in that front diff…I’d be concentrating on the side bearings and pinion bearings.  Never mind about marks that you might see on the crown and pinion….most of them have all sorts of marks on them that scare the living daylights out of the novice, but are perfectly normal. If you want to check backlash properly…you need to measure it at the pinion yoke and divide by two.  In other words, if you measured .020" at the yoke….you actually have .010" of backlash between the crown and pinion.  Do you have a dial gauge? Hopefully, some of this will help. Ian

Response:

Front Stub axel bearings? How many miles/kilometres? Respectfully Rolf

Response:

Chevy Astro or GMC Safari?

Question:

I have a 94 Astro that I bought w/72,000 & now my son is driving it w/190,000 on it uses no oil I tuned it once @125,00,change oil every 3,000 still doesn’t use any,original trans,I put shocks & just put new idler arms on (one fell off) some tires & brakes.It’s been a good workhorse,it’s a cargo & has seen some heavy loads from time to time.

Response:

    I own the safari, 1995 model  I love the way the rear dutch doors are. Very convenient for everyday grocery getting and such.         I don’t however like the ride and handling of these models. Try to rent one for a weekend and drive it a lot! You may hate it after 3-4 hours of highway driving. Mine is a handful on a windy day I still believe the alignment is off but it has been in for 4 alignments and to a frame shop too. I see one now and then one on the highway that tracks straight as an arrow while mine weaves back and forth across the lane. Also there is NO passenger foot room up front remember this if your passenger is tall or large.

Response:

> Hello, > this might not be easy to answer but still I was looking at two cars a chevy > astro and a gmc safari now i don’t know which one to buy. Has either one of > them factory problems and how about part prices, service and average > lifetime. > I appreciate any thought > thanks > Christian

Same vehicle, same parts, same strengths and weaknesses with both.  They are made on the same assembley line.  Only thing different is the badge and some trim. Doc

Response:

I own an 87 Astro with the 4.3 "Z" TBI engine.  ("Z" is the eighth digit of the VIN–non Vortec).  Great engine.  Usually just normal tune-ups etc.  The engine has 190 thousand miles and uses a quart of oil every 5 thousand miles. Second tranny.  Was in there when I bought the van.   I’ve been the owner since about 120 thousand and started running Amsoil right away changing oil and filter every 5 thousand.  Astro’s are noted for front end parts, especially upper ball joints, and idler arms.  I bought Moog parts and put them in myself.  Moog has a lifetime warranty.  I just picked up a new set of idler arms for free cause I kept my receipt…  Saved me almost another $200 in parts.  I really like this engine for pure reliability and fuel economy compared to the newer engine.  When not towing I get about 21-23 mpg. Any of the Astro/Safari vans with the 4.3 Vortec (typically "W" is the eighth digit of the VIN)  These have higher horse power and a balance shaft compared to the "Z" engine.  Most people I’ve talked to about fuel economy for this motor says they can’t get higher than 16-17 mpg on the highway UNLESS they get a major tail wind. On the Vortec’s, the injector/regulator assembly is a common problem.  It’s not a matter of "if" but "when" this will fail.   If any part of this assembly fails, the entire assembly must be replaced.  The part alone retails for approx. $300.  Then there is labor to put it in.  Also, this engine has to have a minimum of 48-50psi of fuel pressure MINIMUM just to run (50-57 is spec I believe).  Without a min fuel pressure of say 50 psi, the veh WILL NOT start cause there isn’t enough pressure to overcome the spring behind the ball/seat at the end of the injector assembly.  From the factory, these vehicle’s came with a fuel pump and pulsator assembly in the tank.  Depending on the state you live in, when it’s time to do a fuel pump, the fuel lines going into the tank are generally seized and the lines break or they have to be cut.  This means the fuel sending unit needs to be replaced.  This sending unit is an assembly of steel tubing with a place to mount the pump, has the float, and variable resistor assembly for the fuel gauge.  This ridiculous looking invention retails at almost $400 for a Delco assembly.  Sometimes an aftermarket one will work but your fuel gauge may never work the same without the OEM assembly.  I’ve seen a lot of bad check valves in the original pumps and many pulsators blown out which causes extended crank time/no start condition.  There is an updated pulsator that is a much better unit which retails for approx. $60.  I don’t usually use the new pulsator.  I use the piece of hose and two clamps that comes in the Delco replacement pump box. There are enough things that can go wrong with this fuel system so I keep the fuel tank to one possible point of failure, the pump.  If you get what my shop calls the "full meal deal", your in the ball park of $1500 to replace the pump, pulsator, sending unit and injector assembly.   Usually it’s time to add in a full tune up cause the dog houses on these vans typically only come off when there is a problem. In 96 and later the newer Vortec engine has an injection assembly that the components can be serviced individually.  If only one injector fails, you can replace just the one.  I usually suggest to do the fuel pressure regulator while in there.  So it’s potentially less expensive, but not a huge savings.  The pump is a complete "module" as they call it, so pump goes bad, you have to buy the $300-$400 assembly for the tank. In my opinion, all in all they are good vehicles.  Tougher than an average "minivan", but not a full-size van either.  Much better for towing than any other "minivans".  But they do have some known issues. Hope This Helps Sorry so long.. Nick

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hello, > this might not be easy to answer but still I was looking at two cars a > chevy > astro and a gmc safari now i don’t know which one to buy. Has either one > of > them factory problems and how about part prices, service and average > lifetime. > I appreciate any thought > thanks > Christian > Same vehicle, same parts, same strengths and weaknesses with both.  They are > made on the same assembley line.  Only thing different is the badge and some > trim. > Doc

Response:

Hello, this might not be easy to answer but still I was looking at two cars a chevy astro and a gmc safari now i don’t know which one to buy. Has either one of them factory problems and how about part prices, service and average lifetime. I appreciate any thought thanks Christian

Response:

96 GMC Safari

Question:

i’d need $750.00.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> So, how much ya want for it ? > I’ve got a 96 GMC Safari AWD Van. It was leaking coolant from the intake > manifold gasket to the top of the engine (no water in oil). I had to move > the van around the driveway a few times til I had time to replace intake > gasket. I replaced the gasket, filled cooling system and check the oil. > NOW > I have a lot of water in the oil. I drained the oil, water slowly kept > coming out. The more I put in the radiator the more that slowly comes out > the oil pan. I pulled the intake and everything looked fine, I reassembled > still the same. I purchased a cooling system pressure test and it’ll hold > about 3-5lb pressure for a few minuets and then leak down and more water > out > the pan. I have now pulled the intake again and duct taped the head water > passages and plugged all disconnected hoses and put water in the radiator > , > again water slowly out the oil pan. > So now I believe I have either a cracked block/head or headgasket leaking. > Any ideas how to diagnose further? > Thanks > Kevin

Response:

So, how much ya want for it ?

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve got a 96 GMC Safari AWD Van. It was leaking coolant from the intake > manifold gasket to the top of the engine (no water in oil). I had to move > the van around the driveway a few times til I had time to replace intake > gasket. I replaced the gasket, filled cooling system and check the oil. NOW > I have a lot of water in the oil. I drained the oil, water slowly kept > coming out. The more I put in the radiator the more that slowly comes out > the oil pan. I pulled the intake and everything looked fine, I reassembled > still the same. I purchased a cooling system pressure test and it’ll hold > about 3-5lb pressure for a few minuets and then leak down and more water out > the pan. I have now pulled the intake again and duct taped the head water > passages and plugged all disconnected hoses and put water in the radiator , > again water slowly out the oil pan. > So now I believe I have either a cracked block/head or headgasket leaking. > Any ideas how to diagnose further? > Thanks > Kevin

Response:

Kevin,     It seems very odd that there was no coolant in the oil before you changed the gasket, and now it’s running out of the pan.     Anyhow, here is an idea. If your van has an engine oil cooler in the radiator, you might want to disconnect the oil cooler lines from the radiator (Left side/driver’s side). Then, add water to the radiator and see if it runs out of the cooler connectors at the radiator.     Usually when the head gasket leaks coolant, it’s into the cylinder, into the lifter valley, or out of the engine. If it gets into the cylinder, it usually stays there. It can’t get past the rings until the engine is running. Well,… it can, but not fast enough to see it pour out of the oil pan.     One last test. Apply compressed air to each cylinder with the spark plugs out. Use a compression tester. Some of these have a 2 piece hose with a quick coupler. If yours doesn’t have one, then spin the gage off and put an air fitting on it. One by one, apply about 20-30 psi to each cylinder. If you hear air coming out of the radiator neck, then it’s time to pull the heads, inspect the gaskets, and inspect the cylinder walls for cracks. Of course, this requires an air compressor and a compression tester. If you don’t have these, then you can’t do this test.     That’s about it. I’m tapped out of ideas. Perhaps another in the group may give you some more. GMdude

Response:

You might try www.astrosafari.com  for help and info.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve got a 96 GMC Safari AWD Van. It was leaking coolant from the intake > manifold gasket to the top of the engine (no water in oil). I had to move > the van around the driveway a few times til I had time to replace intake > gasket. I replaced the gasket, filled cooling system and check the oil. NOW > I have a lot of water in the oil. I drained the oil, water slowly kept > coming out. The more I put in the radiator the more that slowly comes out > the oil pan. I pulled the intake and everything looked fine, I reassembled > still the same. I purchased a cooling system pressure test and it’ll hold > about 3-5lb pressure for a few minuets and then leak down and more water out > the pan. I have now pulled the intake again and duct taped the head water > passages and plugged all disconnected hoses and put water in the radiator , > again water slowly out the oil pan. > So now I believe I have either a cracked block/head or headgasket leaking. > Any ideas how to diagnose further? > Thanks > Kevin

Response:

I’ve got a 96 GMC Safari AWD Van. It was leaking coolant from the intake manifold gasket to the top of the engine (no water in oil). I had to move the van around the driveway a few times til I had time to replace intake gasket. I replaced the gasket, filled cooling system and check the oil. NOW I have a lot of water in the oil. I drained the oil, water slowly kept coming out. The more I put in the radiator the more that slowly comes out the oil pan. I pulled the intake and everything looked fine, I reassembled still the same. I purchased a cooling system pressure test and it’ll hold about 3-5lb pressure for a few minuets and then leak down and more water out the pan. I have now pulled the intake again and duct taped the head water passages and plugged all disconnected hoses and put water in the radiator , again water slowly out the oil pan. So now I believe I have either a cracked block/head or headgasket leaking. Any ideas how to diagnose further? Thanks Kevin

Response:

97 safari

Question:

It is in the right front of the engine compartment. It is integral with the resistor pack. Don

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I was wondering if anyone knew where the Hi Blower Relay is located on a 97 > GMC Safari. I have the lower 3 speeds to the blower but can’t get the HI > setting to work. Would appreciate the help > thanks Steve

Response:

I was wondering if anyone knew where the Hi Blower Relay is located on a 97 GMC Safari. I have the lower 3 speeds to the blower but can’t get the HI setting to work. Would appreciate the help thanks Steve

Response:

94 Savanna

Question:

HI all, I aquired a 94 GMC Savanna AWD. That is need of a intake manifold gasket (coolant leaks out the back). Anybody know what the book time is on a job like this? Thanks Kevin

Response:

Right around 5.6-6.0 hours.

> HI all, > I aquired a 94 GMC Savanna AWD. That is need of a intake manifold gasket > (coolant leaks out the back). Anybody know what the book time is on a job > like this? > Thanks > Kevin

—–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups – 16 Different Servers! =—–

Response:

Sorry to inform you, no such beast exists. First it’s not spelled Savanna, it is Savana. Second there were no Savanas until 1996. Third AWD Savanas did not exist until 2003. Might you be referring to Safari, GMC version of Astro? KenG – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > HI all, > I aquired a 94 GMC Savanna AWD. That is need of a intake manifold gasket > (coolant leaks out the back). Anybody know what the book time is on a job > like this? > Thanks > Kevin

Response:

You are correct, it’s a 1996 GMC Safari AWD. I wasn’t paying attention to what I was typing. I’m trying to calculate my investment in this van if I replace the intake manifold gasket. I think it’s more than the 5-6 hours stated in the other post. There has to be at least an hour in r & r ‘ing the doghouse, passenger seat and air cleaner assembly just to see the engine. Kevin – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Sorry to inform you, no such beast exists. First it’s not spelled > Savanna, it is Savana. Second there were no Savanas until 1996. Third > AWD Savanas did not exist until 2003. Might you be referring to Safari, > GMC version of Astro? > KenG > HI all, > I aquired a 94 GMC Savanna AWD. That is need of a intake manifold gasket > (coolant leaks out the back). Anybody know what the book time is on a job > like this? > Thanks > Kevin

Response: